I maintain the Wikiepedia webpage on the Seth Material and would like to add all the times that Seth was right about something years in advance of science, etc. There are many instances of such but they are scattered throughout 30 or so volumes for which there is no master index as yet.
When you come across a passage that is prescient in this way, put it in this thread; or when you come across when science caught up or a new study, etc., is published that vindicates Seth’s comments, post that.
Eg.: Seth said genes could change their expression and science mocked him for saying so; now there is a whole subfield called epigenetics.
The original passage/reference is most helpful.
The Wikipedia page is still hotly contested by atheists and they fight against any little change which is why I fully updated the bibliography (impressive by its mere size on the page)–they can’t argue with facts. So it would be impressive for readers to see such instances of validation and no-one can stop the posting of facts related to the Material.