Thank you, and I agree, Chris, that it is very important. I’m sure many view it when they first search “Seth Material”, and since Wikipedia is trusted, it is a good resource to maximize.
I’m having to do an end-run around the atheists who fight on the Wiki page to minimize its content. At one point, laughably, they argued that since they didn’t think Seth existed, there should be no Wikipedia entry on the Seth Material at all. They are aggressive. I tried to remove a non-contentious, non-essential element and explained why but that was shot down; it’s unimportant compared to other areas–like creating a whole new section that is historical and factual and, thusly, that they cannot bar inclusion of, nor dispute, its relevance. Hehehe.
Hence my plan to get help in collecting the specific incidents where Seth was right first, the exact passages in the Material, where,they are found., and the date of scientific discovery. These drama queens need footnotes!